| Pros | Cons | What's New |
|---|---|---|
Efficient transmission system | Substandard fuel economy V8 engine | New Black Appearance Package |
Blistering V8 engine | Constrained cargo space | Super Track Pack for V6 models |
Intuitive infotainment system | ||
Enticing design |
$30,245
price292 hp @ 6350 rpm
horsepower260 lb.-ft. @ 4800 rpm
torque8-Speed Shiftable Automatic
transmission3.6L 6cyl AWD 8A
engine-
basic warrantyThe midsize sedan segment has seen a meteoric rise in success over the last few decades and the Dodge Charger has been at the forefront of this change. It packs brute American power into an everyday vehicle. It is more utilitarian as compared to its sibling, the Dodge Challenger while upholding performance and practicality.
Amongst the trim levels, we recommend opting for the 2016 Dodge Charger SXT that makes use of a Pentastar V6 engine to deliver its performance. At a diminutive price difference, it adds functional specifications over and above the base variant and most importantly provides an option to be channeled as an RWD or AWD variant.
For the MY 2016, Dodge has sought to introduce minimal changes to the Charger. Apart from it, the 2016 Charger is still an agile and versatile sedan that continues to compete against the Toyota Avalon, Ford Taurus, and Chrysler 300. Does the latest iteration hold enough competitive merit, let’s find out.
The 2016 Dodge Charger is offered in six different trim levels, each of which shares a distinct feature set. In addition, there are two engine and drivetrain options to choose from. It falls in a defined price range that extends from $27,995 for the base variant to $50,995 for the top-tier trim. Some of the exclusive trim-wise features include:
|
Trim |
SE |
SXT |
R/T |
Road and Track |
R/T Scat Pack |
SRT 392 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MSRP (RWD) |
$27,995 |
$29,995 |
$33,895 |
$36,895 |
$39,995 |
$50,995 |
|
MSRP (AWD) |
$30,495 |
$31,995 |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
|
Key Features |
All-season front and rear tires |
Adds to or retains features of SE |
Adds to or retains features of SXT |
Adds to or retains features of R/T |
Adds to or retains features of Road and Track |
Adds to or retains features of R/T Scat Pack |
|
|
Tire Pressure Monitor |
Front and rear performance tires |
V8 engine option |
Heated Front Seats |
Passenger Lumbar |
Heated Steering Wheel |
|
|
Cruise Control |
Fog Lamps |
Fog Lamps |
Fog Lamps |
Rearview Camera |
Heated Mirrors |
|
|
Leather-wrapped steering wheel |
Universal Garage Door Opener |
Universal Garage Door Opener |
Universal Garage Door Opener |
Powered Passenger Seat |
Leather Upholstery |
|
|
Keyless entry |
Heated Mirrors |
Heated Mirrors |
Heated Mirrors |
Cruise Control |
Mirror Memory |
We Recommend
Amongst the trim levels, we recommend opting for the 2016 Dodge Charger SXT that makes use of a Pentastar V6 engine to deliver its performance. At a diminutive price difference, it adds functional specifications over and above the base variant and most importantly provides an option to be channeled as an RWD or AWD variant.
The 2016 Dodge Charger comes equipped with a 3.6L Pentastar V6 engine option that belts out 292hp and 260lb.-ft of torque. It comes mated to an 8-speed shiftable automatic transmission unit that is butter smooth in its shifts and never seems to be in the wrong gear. While the transmission unit is standard on all trims, the midsize sedan also offers a V8 engine with the R/T and the SRT 392 trims. While the V6 engines offer both FWD and AWD options, the V8 units do not offer AWD options.
In terms of drivability, the 2016 Dodge Charger is both precise in its handling and maneuverability. It is immensely responsive to throttle and the riding excitement only increases with the V8 trims. A V6 engine-equipped Charger can sprint from 0 to 60 mph in 6.4 seconds and can breach the quarter-mile mark in 14.8 seconds.
|
Model |
Dodge Charger |
Ford Taurus |
Toyota Avalon |
Chrysler 300 S |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MSRP |
$31,995 |
$31,390 |
$35,850 |
$38,095 |
|
Engine |
3.6L V6 |
3.5L V6 |
3.5L V6 |
3.6L V6 |
|
Drivetrain |
AWD |
AWD |
FWD |
AWD |
|
Transmission |
8-speed automatic |
6-speed automatic |
6-speed automatic |
8-speed automatic |
|
Power |
292hp |
288hp |
268hp |
300hp |
|
Torque |
260lb.-ft |
254lb.-ft |
248lb.-ft |
264lb.-ft |
|
0-60 MPH (seconds) |
6.4 seconds |
6.3 seconds |
6.4 seconds |
6.6 seconds |
|
Quarter mile (mph) |
14.8 seconds |
15.1 seconds |
14.8 seconds |
15.1 seconds |
|
Top speed (mph) |
N/A |
151 MPH |
N/A |
157 MPH |
While all competitors make use of a V6 engine, the 2016 Toyota Avalon bears distinction by being an FWD variant. Despite its lower outputs of 268hp and 248lb.-ft, it manages similar timings as the Dodge in both tests. The 2016 Ford Taurus is the quickest to the 60-mph mark taking 6.3 seconds, however, it falls to the last place in the quarter-mile run taking 15.1 seconds. The most expensive 2016 Chrysler 300 S produces 300hp of power but lurks at the bottom of the table when performance is concerned.
The 2016 Dodge Charger maintains impressive fuel efficiency keeping in mind the performance it delivers. It averages 19 MPG in the city, 31 MPG on the highway, and 23 MPG combined. Its fuel tank is considerably sized and can hold 18.5-gallons, which directly helps in improving the range it covers. In the city, the 2016 Charger manages to cover 352 miles in a single fuel stop, which increases to 573 miles on the highway. However, efficiency falls with the V8 option.
|
Model |
Dodge Charger |
Ford Taurus |
Toyota Avalon |
Chrysler 300 S |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MPG (city) |
19 |
17 |
21 |
18 |
|
MPG (Highway) |
31 |
24 |
31 |
27 |
|
MPG (Combined) |
23 |
19 |
24 |
21 |
|
Fuel Capacity |
18.5-gallons |
19 gallons |
17 gallons |
19.1 gallons |
|
Range (City/highway) |
352/573 miles |
323/456 miles |
357/527 miles |
343.8/515.7 miles |
The 2016 Avalon is the most efficient option averaging a combined efficiency of 24 MPG. However, Toyota equips the sedan with a small fuel tank that can hold only 17-gallons. On the other hand, the Ford and Chrysler are rather less efficient averaging 19 and 21 MPG, respectively but sport the largest fuel tanks. The 2016 Taurus, however, manages the lowest range averaging 323 and 456 miles in the city and on the highway.
The 2016 Dodge Charger’s interiors have more room than the Challenger. The addition of actual rear seats where people can sit is very convenient. However, the rear seats are nowhere near a luxury sedan in terms of room and comfort. While the front seats bestow maximum pleasure, the cargo capacity of 16.5 cubic feet feels underwhelming.
In terms of design and setup, the 2016 Dodge Charger sports an ergonomic cabin. Each usable element is placed in the vicinity of the driver and is curated to cater to the driver’s dynamics. The tranquility of the cabin is noteworthy. There is ample storage space on the inside including the glove compartment and box between the driver and passenger seats.
|
Model |
Dodge Charger |
Ford Taurus |
Toyota Avalon |
Chrysler 300 S |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Passenger capacity |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
Front (Head/Shoulder/Leg) (In.) |
38.6/59.5/41.8 |
39/57.9/41.9 |
37.6/58.2/42.1 |
38.6/59.5/41.8 |
|
Second (Head/Shoulder/Leg) (In.) |
36.6/57.9/40.1 |
37.8/56.9/38.1 |
37.9/57/39.2 |
37.9/57.7/40.1 |
|
Cargo Capacity (cu. Ft) |
16.5 |
20.1 |
16 |
16.3 |
When compared to the competitors, the 2016 Toyota Avalon has maximum space upfront. However, it is the Chrysler 300 that provides best-in-class comfort for rear-seat occupants, while the Ford Taurus has comparable space but exceeds in cargo capacity having a total trunk volume of 20.1 cubic feet.
Some of the salient interior features include:
The 2016 Dodge Charger features a central touchscreen which is either a 5-inch or 8.4-inch unit depending on the trim you opt for. Irrespective, it is intuitive and easy to use and gets surrounded by large knobs and buttons for better control. Some of the salient infotainment features include:
The 2016 Dodge Charger, unlike the Challenger, does not resemble its ancestors from the 60s. The Charger is completely changed and looks tasteful. The traditional Dodge grille that sits upfront adds familiarity to the overall design, while the headlights and fog lamps are rather imposing in their appearance. At the rear-end, the adjoined taillamps with the spoiler give it a true sports car-like appearance.
In its dimensions and proportions, the 2016 Dodge Charger fits perfectly in the segment. It is one of the heavier sedans in the segment and weighs 4,188 lbs. It is impressively long and sports the longest wheelbase of 120.3 inches. However, its low-slung does mean a lower height and ground clearance than competitors measuring 58.2 and 4.9 inches, respectively.
|
Model |
Dodge Charger |
Ford Taurus |
Toyota Avalon |
Chrysler 300 S |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Curb weight (lbs.) |
4,188 |
4,196 |
3,461 |
4,235 |
|
Length(in) |
198.4 |
202.9 |
195.3 |
198.6 |
|
Width(in) |
75 |
76.2 |
72.2 |
75 |
|
Height(in) |
58.2 |
60.7 |
57.5 |
59.2 |
|
Ground clearance (in) |
4.9 |
N/A |
5.5 |
4.8 |
|
Wheelbase (in) |
120.2 |
112 |
111 |
120.2 |
The 2016 Chrysler 300 is rather similar in dimensions to the Dodge. It shares a similar length, wheelbase, and width. However, is an inch taller and is also the heaviest vehicle weighing 4,235 lbs. The Toyota Avalon on the other hand is the lightest sedan weighing 3,461 lbs. While its wheelbase is shorter, the 2016 Ford Taurus is the longest, widest, and tallest vehicle in the segment measuring 202.9, 76.2, and 60.7 inches, respectively.
Some of the salient exterior features of the 2016 Dodge Charger include:
The 2016 Dodge Charger sports a sturdy and muscular body structure that ensures top-notch safety and reliability. It gets awarded with the highest possible scores by the NHTSA and IIHS, which backs its capabilities. It comes equipped with standard features like electronic roll mitigation, a vehicle security system, and a tire-pressure monitoring system.
Some of the other safety features on the 2016 Dodge Charger include:
The 2016 Dodge Charger is a perfect mix of utility and fun. It combines the best of both worlds with its cogent engine lineup and a practical driving experience that makes it one of the better cars in the segment. Overall, the Charger is more potent than some of the competitors and easy to live with. It is offered in a number of trims that help it cater to a large section of society making it an apt fit in the segment.
Car Name | 0-60 MPH | Quarter Mile | Top Speed | Source | Compare | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2016 Dodge Charger Ranked #8 | 6.6 sec | 15.1 sec | 142 mph | |||
2016 BMW M5 Ranked #1 | 3.7 sec | 11.9 sec | - | |||
2016 Lexus GS F Ranked #2 | 4.4 sec | 12.6 sec | 177 mph | |||
2016 Chevrolet SS Ranked #3 | 5 sec | 13.1 sec | - | |||
2016 Hyundai Genesis Ranked #4 | 5.9 sec | - | - | |||
2016 Nissan Maxima Ranked #5 | 6.1 sec | 14.5 sec | - |
Car Name | MPG City | MPG Highway | MPG Combined | Fuel Tank Capacity | Range (C/H) | Source | Compare | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2016 Dodge Charger Ranked #3 | 19 mpg | 31 mpg | 23 mpg | 18.5 gal. | 351.5/573.5 mi. | |||
2016 Nissan Maxima Ranked #1 | 22 mpg | 30 mpg | 25 mpg | 18 gal. | 396/540 mi. | |||
2016 Toyota Avalon Ranked #2 | 21 mpg | 30 mpg | 24 mpg | 17 gal. | 357/527 mi. | |||
2016 Chrysler 300 Ranked #3 | 19 mpg | 31 mpg | 23 mpg | 18.5 gal. | 362.9/592.1 mi. | |||
2016 Kia Cadenza Ranked #4 | 19 mpg | 28 mpg | 22 mpg | 18.5 gal. | 351.5/518 mi. | |||
2016 Hyundai Genesis Ranked #4 | 18 mpg | 29 mpg | 22 mpg | 20.3 gal. | 365.4/588.7 mi. |
Car Name | Length | Width | Height | Ground Clearance | Wheelbase | Source | Compare | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2016 Dodge Charger Ranked #4 | 198.4 in. | 75 in. | 58.2 in. | 4.9 in. | 120.2 in. | |||
2016 Ford Taurus Ranked #1 | 202.9 in. | 76.2 in. | 60.7 in. | 5.1 in. | 112.9 in. | |||
2016 Chevrolet Impala Ranked #2 | 200.4 in. | 72.9 in. | 58.7 in. | 7 in. | 110.5 in. | |||
2016 Chrysler 300 Ranked #3 | 198.6 in. | 75 in. | 58.4 in. | 4.7 in. | 120.2 in. | |||
2016 Buick LaCrosse Ranked #5 | 196.9 in. | 73.1 in. | 59.2 in. | 7 in. | 111.7 in. | |||
2016 Hyundai Genesis Ranked #6 | 196.5 in. | 74.4 in. | 58.3 in. | 5.3 in. | 118.5 in. |
Car Name | Trunk Capacity | Passenger Volume | Max Trunk Volume | Source | Compare | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2016 Dodge Charger Ranked #1 | 16.5 cu.ft. | 104.7 cu.ft. | 150 cu.ft. | |||
2016 Buick LaCrosse Ranked #2 | 13.3 cu.ft. | 142.7 cu.ft. | 83.2 cu.ft. | |||
2016 Ford Taurus Ranked #3 | 20.1 cu.ft. | 102.2 cu.ft. | 59.9 cu.ft. | |||
2016 Chevrolet SS Ranked #4 | 16.4 cu.ft. | 112 cu.ft. | 16.4 cu.ft. | |||
2016 BMW M5 Ranked #5 | 14 cu.ft. | 108.1 cu.ft. | 73.3 cu.ft. | |||
2016 Chevrolet Impala Ranked #6 | 18.6 cu.ft. | 101.5 cu.ft. | 18.6 cu.ft. |
Car Name | Cargo Volume | Cargo Volume w/ Seat Area | Max Cargo Volume | Bed Length | Source | Compare | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2016 Dodge Charger Ranked #1 | 150 cu.ft. | 16.5 cu.ft. | 150 cu.ft. | - | |||
2016 Lexus GS F Ranked #2 | 14 cu.ft. | 14 cu.ft. | 14 cu.ft. | - | |||
2016 Ford Taurus Ranked #3 | 83.1 cu.ft. | 20.1 cu.ft. | 59.9 cu.ft. | 67 ft. | |||
2016 Chevrolet Impala Ranked #4 | 57.3 cu.ft. | 18.6 cu.ft. | 18.6 cu.ft. | - | |||
2016 Hyundai Genesis Ranked #5 | 15.3 cu.ft. | 15.3 cu.ft. | 15.3 cu.ft. | - | |||
2016 Chevrolet SS Ranked #6 | 76.3 cu.ft. | 16.4 cu.ft. | 16.4 cu.ft. | 98 ft. |
Car Name | Towing Capacity | Payload Capacity | Weight | Source | Compare | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2016 Dodge Charger Ranked #2 | - | 1015 lbs. | 3934 lbs. | |||
2016 Buick LaCrosse Ranked #1 | 1000 lbs. | - | 3895 lbs. | |||
2016 Toyota Avalon Ranked #1 | 1000 lbs. | - | 3505 lbs. | |||
2016 Chrysler 300 Ranked #1 | 1000 lbs. | - | 4029 lbs. | |||
2016 Chevrolet Impala Ranked #1 | 1000 lbs. | 1140 lbs. | 3555 lbs. | |||
2016 Ford Taurus Ranked #1 | 1000 lbs. | - | 3917 lbs. |
[3 Reviews]
[33.0%] [1 Reviews]
[0.0%] [0 Reviews]
[0.0%] [0 Reviews]
[0.0%] [0 Reviews]
[0.0%] [0 Reviews]
POPULAR TAGS
User Overall Rating
Posted On: June 18, 2024
This 3.6 VVT has a good amount of power, pushing 292hp this is a perfect daily driver .All you need are some simple modifications and a lot of gasoline. My favorite thing about this car is the modern taillight. The 17in alloy rims clean up nice.
User Overall Rating
Posted On: June 11, 2024
This car is a dream. It is the safest vehicle I have bought. It is also pretty good on gas considering it is a V6. I get anywhere from 18 to 21 mpg in the city and 24 to 33 mpg on the expressway. The traction control on this rear wheel drive vehicle is amazing in the snow. I have never gotten stuck in Chicago with the winters as they are. The air conditioning is amazing, ice cold car in about 5 m...
User Overall Rating
Posted On: May 9, 2024
Overall I would buy another charger but the next one would be hellcat or the new twin turbo V6 ... The hemi has tons of power all the way with the 3.07 gearing in it from down low to the top end it just keeps on pulling .. the mpg isn't the greatest especially with the AWD model I only get like 13-15 mpg if im lucky depending on how I drive but not that great that's for sure .the interior is very...
